Saturday, December 27, 2008

Obama is fronting for the secretive, elitist power behind the power in USA.

Pay attention to his CIA2/MOSSAD appointments....working full time for the secret power behind the power in USA and the PNAC hegemonic designs worldwide getting a new lease on life. In fact, I reaffirm that these so-called Zionist/Israeli/Jewish/evangelical lobbies, are completely subservient to the real power behind the power in USA.

It's pretty obvious that an apparently newly forming neo-con and neo-lib consortium of oligarchs have bought Obama. We won't see any further investigation of the Cheney/Bush Administration once he takes office and he'll use the very same excuses that Jerry Ford used - "We need to move on for the good of the nation" [paraphrased]....

I'm convinced that we saw this same vote getting machine at work with McCain to get him through the New Hampshire primary. McCain was literally at the bottom of a heap of losers when prominent neo-cons Joe Lieberman and Charles Krauthammer endorsed him in a major media blitz. They had few alternatives at the time -- a time before Obama was brought on board with campaign finance capital and threats using Larry Sinclair. Suddenly McCain's pole numbers exploded (I believe the some polls were bogus and others electronically manipulated) and only two weeks later he won New Hampshire.
Most are pretty blind to who Obama really is as well. Her censor bots are over there working overtime. As someone whom you all know has a reputation for insisting on objectivity over anti-Semitism, let me just say you don't use the word "Israel" without the censor bot seizing your message for further analyzes by a "human."
These folks who parade themselves as Progressive are just leaving me astounded and nauseated, the least of whom are the most virulent of Obama's supporters who haven't been paying attention to his CIA2/MOSSAD appointments.... working full time for the secret power behind the power in USA and the PNAC hegemonic designs worldwide getting a new lease on life. In fact, I reaffirm that these so-called Zionist/Israeli/Jewish/evangelical lobbies, are completely subservient to the real power behind the power in USA.

You would like this site: is dead. is live.

Watch what happens when you click on it, Liberty. Ooooh. Ahhhh.
Picture electric light bulbs clicking on overhead.

1919 Letter Offers Evidence That the Rothschild Bank is Truly in Control of America, its Political System, and its "Subjects".

The world is in unison that the scrooge of PNAC CIA2/MOSSAD and the
White House Murder Inc, terror must end. Whether these attacks are
aimed at innocent people, VIPs, world leaders or economic
infrastructure becomes immaterial and we must unite to condemn
these attacks. The more we wonder how the menace of terror has
become invisible we need to factually take into account the sources
and links that have directly or indirectly pumped life into these
monsters and their terror cells and establishments. The answers to
these will provide the reasons why terror still remains over and above
the calls for the elimination of terrorism from the world.

How do these terrorists operate – from where do they get the money to
buy weapons and ammunition – how do they escape international and
local detection - how are they able to transport these items to
various destinations – who trains these men and women and even
children and where are these training bases – why are they not
revealed to the international public? Do they have links to a
country’s intelligence services, which are the countries that profit
from the arms trade and how much of these are provided to terrorists
and why?

These are some of the questions that will answer why terrorism still
exists. Of the oft quoted examples we are aware that money is raised
from extortion, drug trafficking, foreign supporters, money
laundering, charitable organizations, legitimate businesses and even
State patronage. Islamic terrorist groups pass money through a system
known as ‘hawala’. Afghanistan is the haven for opium as is Myanmar
and one of the reasons why Taliban regime thrives and surprisingly
enough despite the US occupation in Afghanistan opium production has
plummeted to over 4000 tons – the IMF says that heroin represents
40-50% of Afghanistan’s economy & 95% of its economic recovery. Did we
mention that the US is the world’s largest user of heroin! There is a
greater urgency to explore the links to these non-state actors and to
find out whether they are being influenced by legitimate Governments &
their connected agencies & offices.

The list of terrorist organizations is many. Governments of various
countries have their own individual lists and the UN the custodian of
world peace has its own list. Many would prefer going by the UN list
of terrorists but unfortunately the UN list has come into controversy
with the inclusion of Haji Muhammad Ashraf of the Lashkar-e-Taiba
who’s been dead for over 6 years.

Countries also have banned some groups and even frozen their assets.
The US State Dept has 42 Foreign Terrorist Organizations listed. The
UK has 45 international terrorist organizations listed. The EU has
placed 47 terrorist organizations on its list but surprisingly enough
the EU has excluded the Al Qaeda. This may be in large measure due to
the fact that the Al Qaeda is more of a franchise entity with a
network collection of groups all linked to it. But, there still
remains only one supreme commander therefore EU needs to explain why
its list excludes Al Qaeda. Australia’s list of terrorist
organizations number 18. Amidst the inconsistency in designating
terrorist organizations we are compelled to explore whether the
proverbial saying that one man’s freedom fighter is another man’s
terrorist is actually true. As we wonder why terrorism continues to
thrive and contemplate how much terrorism has turned into a lifestyle
for some and a business for others we need to realistically picture
the real situation in order to understand what exactly is really
happening around us.

Links to terrorists

Amidst the controversies there are plenty of allegations and counter
allegations often against Governments and their intelligence services
who in the pretext of their national sovereignty foster terror in
foreign climes by training terrorists. It was the US who created Bin
Laden and the Al Qaeda to fight a war against Russia who invaded
Afghanistan. Could it not be that these fighters trained to resist
moves of forceful occupation are now confused by the change in
ideology when the US decides to invade Iraq and Afghanistan? As we
raise alarms over terrorism and its rise throughout the world, we
should first ask how and why powerful Governments chose to carry out
covert and overt operations by creating monsters that have now become
out of control. You find Pakistan being accused of training
terrorists, its army accused of links to terror groups but similarly
all other countries including UK, Germany, France, Iran, Israel,
India, China and the US all have plenty of skeletons in their closets
though they enjoy preaching peace.

India’s intelligence agency – RAW is accountable for the training,
arming and financial support that eventually internationalized the
LTTE into becoming one of the world’s most ruthless killer forces.
India will not acknowledge this nor will India allow the Government of
Sri Lanka to end the terrorism that prevails in the island nation.
India’s National Security Advisor Narayan was one time tasked with
handling the LTTE leader. Similarly, the Indian Intelligence Agency –
RAW is accused of collaborating with the Northern Alliance remnants &
training anti-Pakistan terrorists (tribal dissidents) in Afghanistan
through its 4 consulates located in Afghanistan.

In the wake of the Mumbai attacks a new form of terror arose – where
10 armed men were able to attack 13 places in the financial hub of
Mumbai and take on elite commandos for 60 hours (four successive days)
A global power that watched silently for 4 days as gun fire, grenade
explosions, fires took place may need to look inward and ask why India
took so long to bring things under control and it would become rather
farcical if India goes to war on the grounds that these men were from
Pakistan and that they were trained there. The fact of the matter
remains that all the countries that declare “war on terror” are the
culprits of creating that terror. Had it not been for the selfish and
self-centered reasons for allowing intelligence services to equip,
train and order these men and women to carry out terror we would not
have to fear walking on the streets or entering public places.

The US has been training members of Palestinian President’s Fatah
security forces in Jericho in the West bank since late 1990s.
Currently 300 security members are under US training. US also provide
the Fatah Force 17 which also serves as the Preventative Security
Services with arms and assault rifles in a bid to bolster Fatah
against the Hamas. The funding for the US training is estimated at
USD86.5million approved by the US Congress. It is widely believed that
known terrorist leaders including the deputy commander of the Al Aqsa
Martyrs Brigade and other members of the group that carried out
suicide bombings in Israel in 2005/2006.

Despite giving an amnesty by Israeli former Prime Minister Olmert as a
gesture to Palestinian President Abbas, the Brigade members have not
disarmed but have continued their terror attacks. Thus, while the US
may voice eulogies on its solidarity with the Israeli people the US
training (military and intelligence) and arms supplies to Fatah have
been responsible for the spate of attacks on Israeli interests. Thus,
we can safely assume that the financial, military and intelligence
training provided for the Palestinian resistance by the US has left
over 1000 Israeli dead and us wondering what the US rhetoric on
terrorism is really about. "Schmoozing with Terrorists," a book by
Aaron Klein has even declared that US funded Hamas schools &
university has chemistry labs which produce rockets and suicide bomb

The US Army School of Americas (SOA now known as the Western
Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation) has been under attack
for using terror for foreign policy objectives. The mission of the
school is to train Latin American soldiers in combat, Counter-
insurgency And counter-narcotics. It therefore should come as no
surprise when nearly all of Latin America’s human rights abusers have
actually graduated from the school including Panama’s Manuel Noriega a
CIA operative until he was removed by the US in 1989. Graduates of the
SOA were also part of the 1973 military coup in Chile, the 1976
assassination of former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier in
Washington, and the wars in Argentina and Bolivia in the 1970s. The
SOA is also responsible for training Anastasio Somoza’s National Guard
in Nicaragua in the 1970s, the civil war abuses in El Salvador and
kidnappings in Colombia as well as murders of peace commissioner.

President Eisenhower during his presidency used plenty of covert
operations through CIA to overthrow suspected communist Governments.
Three attempts were made during his Presidency to overthrow
Governments in Iran – CIA replaces Muhammad Mossadegh with Shah
Muhammad Reza Pahlavi (when Mossadegh seized British oil properties in
1953). In Guatemala, the CIA overthrew Jacobo Arbenz Guzman in 1954 &
Indonesia in 1958 with the overthrowing of Sukarno. His Eisenhower
Doctrine promised Middle East nation’s military aid if they were being
threatened by communism.

Presently, there is much focus against Iran and a build up made to
project Iran as fostering terrorism and nuclear weapons. In 2007,
Congress agreed to President Bush’s request to fund a major covert
operation against Iran. A covert operation would mean working with
opposition groups which ultimately will create another terror force.
Is it these creations that eventually refuse to be bound to their
masters and prefer instead to take their own path of instilling terror
and anarchy?

The issue of using covert state terrorism to advance neo-liberal
global project has varied views – we can take as an example the CIA
bombing of a Cuban airliner on October 6, 1976 which killed 73
innocent civilians. It was meant to create fear and submission by the
Cuban authorities. George Bush Snr., was the CIA Director at the time
and there were close ties that linked the Bush family to oil
businesses and key politicians in Venezuela. James Baker who was
appointed Secretary of State owned the Commerce Bank of Texas in
Venezuela. Posada the CIA agent arrested by Cuban authorities for the
bombing threatened to reveal details which would create another
“Watergate” – secrecy, hidden documents all end up cover ups for
realities of situations that take place beyond the score of public
review though the public end up beneficiaries of the terror. The
western Balkans the fate of the “new Kosovo” has emerged following
detection of 3 Germans whether any moves were afoot to replace the UN
office with an EU office. However, the Kosovo media say that the 3 men
are German intelligence agents (BND). This is further to a Christian
Science Monitor report which gave details of a deal with Serbia to
deploy a EU mission in Kosovo.

The public needs to be aware of the interrelationships between the
wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq. In the case of Iraq, the
Iraqi people may wonder whether the dictator Saddam was ever as bad as
their current situation where an average 50 deaths are reported

Evidence in a report compiled by German TV ZDF reveals how the CIA and
the German Intelligence (BND) supported the Kosovo Liberation Army
(KLA) which has links to the Al Qaeda. The report reveals that German
intelligence knew 3 weeks prior to the March 17 attacks on Serbs
throughout Kosovo & Samedin Xhezairi of the KLA was the link between
Albanian extremists and the Al Qaeda. Samedin Xhezair had also fought
in Chechnya, was trained in Afghanistan and was evacuated by US
paratroopers from the US private military company MPRI from Macedonia
barely a few weeks before the September 11 attack on the US. If the US
military has been working with the Al Qaeda we can but wonder what the
"war on terror" is all about.

What remains true is that the Atlantic Alliance supported the KLA and
made them attack ethnic Albanians in order to allow the NATO and US
troops to enter citing "humanitarian" grounds and accuse the Serbian
Government of ethnic cleansing. This was the US and NATO’s "just war"
which resulted in the bombing of Yugoslavia and supported by western
media which provided a disinformation campaign. No one claimed that
the invasion of Kosovo was a violation of international law. As terror
groups most of whom happen to be Islamic fundamentalists become armed
with sophisticated weaponry we not only wonder whether the peace
keeping forces are actively or passively creating a new form of terror
that is assured to turn against their creators as we have seen.

The earliest form of overt operation was committed by the US on
hundreds of thousands of innocent Japanese in 1945 by dropping not one
but 2 atomic bombs. There is also the 1965-72 napalming of large areas
of Vietnam and then the 2003 bombing of Baghdad once again by US

When a nation’s public silently agree to covert operations because
their State Dept labels nations as “rogue nations” the damage is
colossal. Was not the “Special Forces” trained during the World War 2
men who were trained in unconventional warfare? The US media has been
party to most of the heinous crimes that the US Government’s covert
operations have ventured upon. Without balancing their argument they
prefer to project everyone as enemies of the US. In many ways the 9/11
became a wake up which left many asking whether the US’s decision of
turning teams hostile to other nations was not another form of
terrorism? The CIA’s budget is Top Secret and even not disclosed to
Congressmen. So while there is the US military there is also another
set of private and shadow force with the power above US law. As we
read deeper into US "interests" we need to realize how far the US is
likely to go to protect "US interests?" The US entered Somalia in 1991
on the pretext that 1000 people were starving – it turned out not to
be quite the contrary.

What should countries like the US wish to make countries unstable – is
this the way they look after the people’s human rights? There are many
ways invasions are justified – to save people from ruthless dictators
and weapons of mass destruction as was the Iraq example, starvation
was the reason in Somalia, genocide in Kosovo, 9/11 in
Afghanistan….now the covert operations in these nations by US Special
Forces means that men are being trained and supplied with arms so long
as they remain faithful to US interests. Saddam Hussein was a friend
of the US in the 1980s & so was Osama bin Laden.

As we look deeper into terrorism we need to explore its close ties to
Government foreign policies especially those that apply covert & overt
operations and wonder how far they are interlinked. The expense
currently been used to eliminate terrorism and its associated entities
could have cured the world of hunger and even provided different means
of employment. There are 300,000 unemployed in the US. Of the
6.7billion world population 10,023,383 have died so far this year.
USD60,900,000 is spent on weight loss programs in the US. 80,000 tons
of food is wasted daily in the US.

Only USD19,700,000 is needed to feed the world. USD25,800,000 is spent
on pet food in the US & Europe. In 1994 alone, the developing world
spent close to £90 billion on weapons. Yet the United Nations has
estimated that just £11 billion of this money would pay for all the
primary health care needs in all countries that are considered to be
developing countries today.

World military expenditure in 2006 is estimated to have reached $1204
billion in current dollars; The USA, responsible for about 80 per cent
of the increase in 2005, is the principal determinant of the current
world trend, and its military expenditure now accounts for almost half
of the world total. The US accounts for 46% of world military spending
following by UK, France, Japan and China with 4-5% each. Of the active
conflicts in 1999, the United States supplied arms or military
technology to parties in more than 92% of them --39 out of 42. In over
one-third of these conflicts - 18 out of 42 - the United States
provided from 10% to 90% of the arms imported by one side of the
dispute. Between 1986 and 1995 the United States delivered $42 billion
worth of armaments to parties in 45 ongoing conflicts. A significant
portion of the $6 billion in covert U.S. arms and training sent to
Afghan rebel groups in the 1980s was funneled to right-wing Islamic
fundamentalist forces that now use these resources to attack U.S.
allies and citizens.

United States has a consistent record of giving military aid and
weapons to governments that engage in serious human rights abuses,
including Uzbekistan, Colombia, and Turkey. With the arms trade being
such an influencer we cannot ignore some of the practices and impacts
of the arms industry. Most of the armament firms lobby for war
policies so they can continue to sell their arms. These firms even
bribe government officials both at home & abroad even emissaries,
roughly $2.5 billion a year is paid in bribes, nearly a tenth of
turnover; these firms are also able to influence public opinion
through control over news media locally & internationally.

These firms are even able to play one country against another.
We can but wonder how successful has the post 9-11 War on Terror has
actually been & how far human rights of innocent people has been
secured by those waging the war. If we take a look at the Indo-Pak
scenario while the international community wishes for restraint in the
Indo-Pak border, UK & US are attempting to sell arms to India. We can
then wonder why Condoleezza Rice made such a hurried stopover in India
following the Mumbai attack!

So what are the hard realities – is it not true that the arms
manufacturers are profiting from terrorism. We can but wonder whether
these arms are for Governments to defend terror or for terrorists to
terrorize us.

86% of all arms sold come from the 5 permanent members of the UN
Security Council (US, UK, France, Russia & China)

How can these countries Talk Peace but sell arms? Are not these very
nations guilty of having links to terror outfits who were once their
friends but who have now become their foes? The people of the world
are today suffering as a consequence of the clandestine foreign
policies adapted by nations who have involved themselves in covert/
overt/espionage & most recently striking deals with terrorists – most
of whom have been sent through a brainwashing process, trained to
hate, armed to kill & determined to destroy – can any negotiation
work? Obviously not, that is why we will never see a reduction in arms
trade & that is why the world can only dream of a peaceful tomorrow.
Leaders & countries who attempt to quell terrorism are brought down by
fabricating scenarios like human rights violations, kidnapping, extra-
judicial killings so as to provide the basis for world opinion to go
against these countries & to deny them the glory of defeating

Sri Lanka in its last leg of a war that has gone on for almost 30
years has had to face similar accusations – genocide, ethnic
cleansing, and human rights violations. The brigade that unites to
overshadow the military successes of the Government are doing their
best to create a scenario that undermines the Government. So far the
successes of the military, their ability to take over rebel-held
territory have silenced many. The answer to the untruths of genocide
and ethnic cleansing are equally easy to prove – Sri Lanka suffers
none of these fabrications. Yet a formidable challenge to Sri Lanka
still remains India who for internal political survival ends up having
to appease Tamil Nadu leaders most of whom nurse a separatist agenda
that compliments the LTTE terrorism.

How can India warn Pakistan of nurturing terror on its soil when there
are conclusive evidence against India for its role in training Sri
Lanka’s LTTE on Indian soil (in a camp located at Chakrata, Tamil
Nadu) by India’s intelligence service RAW who even termed the LTTE as
"our boys". Is this not a visible example of encouraging cross-border
terrorism by India upon a friendly SAARC neighbor? Yet, Sri Lanka’s
public while condemning the actions of past and present political
leaderships of India still have the highest of regard for India and
its people.

The dangers of allowing terror to continue need not be reminded to
India. The past few years India has had to endure series of bomb
explosions culminating in a 60hour siege by just 10 men. Even for
political survival, India should not have to dance to the tunes of men
like Karunanidhi and Vaiko. We are surprised how the Indian Government
can allow them to openly portray their allegiance with the LTTE while
India preaches peace & the determination to overcome terrorism. Little
does India realize that the LTTE is only a ploy for these Tamil Nadu
leaders to eventually carve out a separate State in Tamil Nadu using
Sri Lanka’s North as their base – the fate of Algeria’s Ben Bella is
likely to happen to Prabakaran the leader-in-hiding of the LTTE.

World leaders those of whom have contributed to the creation of
terrorist organizations and their cells must finally realize that they
cannot control these hostile elements. The tragedy remains that these
world leaders have not been magnanimous enough to accept this reality
– or perhaps the creation of these terror cells is to continue the
sale of arms, the indoctrination of countries and its people to neo-
liberal attitudes etc. Can the world’s powerful nations those that
benefit from wars and terrorism please answer!